Category Archives: Correspondence

A collection of letters written to Christians.

A Chain Cannot be Stronger than its Weakest Link – Response to David

Posted on January 27, 2015 by yourphariseefriend

This letter is a response to David’s comments – you can read them here – 2015/01/26 at 11:25 am     2015/01/26 at 5:33 pm David I find this conversation to be most instructive so I have taken the liberty of making it … Continue reading →

Posted in Correspondence | 43 Comments

3 Challenges – excerpt from Supplement to Contra Brown

Posted on January 12, 2015 by yourphariseefriend

# 7 – The seventh line of reasoning relates to the prohibition against idolatry.   As a general rule, the argument about the authenticity of the traditions of Judaism is not very relevant to the debate between Judaism and Christianity. … Continue reading →

Posted in Correspondence, Critique | 45 Comments

Definitions – An Open Letter to “Concerned” Reader

Posted on December 29, 2014 by yourphariseefriend

Definitions – An Open Letter to “Concerned” Reader Dear Concerned Reader I am writing this letter not only in response to a recent comment of yours (https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2014/12/21/channuka-excerpt-from-contra-brown/#comment-16337 ) but my letter addresses your entire approach in your comments on this … Continue reading →

Posted in Correspondence | 4 Comments

Childishly Easy – An Open Response to Charles

Posted on November 20, 2014 by yourphariseefriend

Childishly Easy – An Open Response to Charles This article is in response to Charles Soper’s comments: https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2014/11/09/excerpt-from-a-written-debate-with-dr-brown-3/#comment-15693 https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2014/11/09/excerpt-from-a-written-debate-with-dr-brown-3/#comment-15735 https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2014/11/09/excerpt-from-a-written-debate-with-dr-brown-3/#comment-15897 Charles You define the “watershed” between us as a debate about God’s nature. Your assessment has no basis in reality. … Continue reading →

Posted in Correspondence, The Ultimate Truth | 106 Comments

An Open Response to YSG

Posted on August 3, 2014 by yourphariseefriend

YSG has been commenting on the “Christianity Unmasked” page for some time now. This is a response to his most recent comment – 2014/08/02 at 7:07 pm YSG You failed to understand my question about the third coming and you … Continue reading →

Posted in Correspondence | 51 Comments

An Open Letter to “Concerned Reader”

Posted on July 28, 2014 by yourphariseefriend

An Open Letter to “Concerned Reader” Dear Concerned Reader; this letter is in response to your recent comment: July 26, 2014 at 3:59 am . I will begin by thanking you for your respectful tone and for your sincerity in … Continue reading →

Posted in Correspondence | 146 Comments

Letter to a Missionary

Posted on July 9, 2014 by yourphariseefriend

Shalom Michoel Thanks for taking the time for this articulate and detailed response. Each additional bit of clarity brings us closer to the truth that we both seek. Thanks for the tone as well. You have my best ear for … Continue reading →

Posted in Correspondence | 1 Comment

Supplement to Response to Charles

Posted on May 5, 2014 by yourphariseefriend

Supplement to Response to Charles Since I did not respond to all of Soper’s arguments in my previous articles I felt that I should perhaps elaborate. I addressed all of Soper’s arguments concerning the validity of the Oral Law in … Continue reading →

Posted in Correspondence | 2 Comments

A Response to Charles

Posted on May 5, 2014 by yourphariseefriend

Charles Soper responded to my article “Facing Scripture” http://www.strateias.org/ybcs.docx – here is my open response to him.   Charles I must begin for commending you for the gracious if frustrating tone that you bring to this discussion. There is no … Continue reading →

Posted in Correspondence | 38 Comments

A Letter from the Past – Still Looking Forward

Posted on February 4, 2014 by yourphariseefriend

Dr. Brown Here is my response to your post # 358 I believe that with this response of yours – a great breakthrough was achieved in our interaction – vindicating the usefulness of such interaction. I will explain this statement … Continue reading →

Posted in Correspondence | 28 Comments