Hezekiah and Isaiah (14:25 – 49:6)

yourphariseefriend's avatar1000 Verses - a project of Judaism Resources

Hezekiah and Isaiah (14:25 – 49:6)

The book of Isaiah can be divided into two parts. The first part of the book (ch. 1 – 36) builds up towards the Assyrian invasion and the destruction of Sennacherib’s army. The second part of the book (ch. 40 – 66) focus on the times beyond the Assyrian invasion of Judah. The central chapters (36 – 39) describe how God miraculously crushed the Assyrian invasion and healed Hezekiah of his sickness.

The story of Hezekiah serves as the backdrop for the entire book of Isaiah. All of Isaiah’s words of rebuke and all of the precious words of comfort and hope that gave our nation the strength, not only to survive, but to persevere and to thrive, are hinged on the Hezekiah narrative.

I believe that a study of Isaiah 14:24 – 26 can help us understand the literary design of the book…

View original post 649 more words

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Biblical Offerings vs. Christian Doctrine

Biblical Offerings versus Christian Doctrine
Christianity contends that the crucifixion of Jesus represents the culmination of the offerings described in the Jewish Bible. It is claimed that Jesus is the “sacrifice to end all sacrifices”.
Is there any truth to this Christian assertion? Let us study the Biblical offerings and see what we can learn.
One feature that is obvious in all of the Scriptural offerings is the fact that nothing remained of them, they were completely consumed. Some of the offerings were immediately burned on the altar, while others were eaten by the priests or by the bearer of the offering. Anything that remained was burned (Exodus 12:10, Leviticus 7:17). The offering itself was eradicated. The only thing that remained from the offering was the closeness to God that it generated.
When an individual walked home after having brought his or her offering in the Temple, the last thing on their mind was the animal that was burned or eaten. The destruction of the animal brought to mind the concept that everything temporal; is just that – temporal. There is no intrinsic value to anything that can be destroyed. The offering brought into focus that our only true possession is the relationship we share with the One who created all.
In short, one of the central concepts of the Biblical offerings was the idea that everything earthly – represented by the offering – has no intrinsic existence. It is only the closeness to God that we obtain through the sincere act of bringing a gift to God that is of any value. The offerings of Scripture reinforced the central concept of Scripture, that God is the absolute Master of all – while the animal that was brought as the offering represented the flimsy nature of the existence of all created beings – including life itself.
Imagine if someone were to return from having brought an offering in the Temple with a portrait of the animal that he or she had brought as an offering. Imagine further that this individual hangs this portrait in a prominent place in his or her home. This individual goes around praising the animal: “Oh what a perfect sacrifice! Completely unblemished! This offering is my best friend because through it I achieved atonement from my sins!” – It would be obvious to one and all that this individual has completely misunderstood the Biblical sacrifices. Instead of learning the lesson of the offering – that all earthly existence is but a dream – this individual attempts to exalt an example of earthly existence.
The individual in our parable is none other than the Christian theologian. The Christian theologian points to the supposed sacrifice of Jesus in order to exalt Jesus. With this doctrine, the Christian has turned the Biblical concept of sacrifice inside out. The point of the Biblical sacrifice was to emphasize the ephemeral nature of the article brought as an offering and to exalt the Creator of all. Exalting the item brought as an offering goes directly against the basic theme of the Biblical offerings.

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

Posted in General | 75 Comments

The Blood of the Lamb

yourphariseefriend's avatar1000 Verses - a project of Judaism Resources

The Blood of the Lamb

Christians are impressed that it was the blood (!) Of the lamb which saved the Jews in Egypt. Well it was. But it means something quite different than the meaning that Christians have read into it. In fact the blood of the lamb represents the precise opposite of the Christian claims for Jesus. It is the Jewish rejection of Jesus together with their rejection of all idolatry that saves the Jewish people.

We must ask ourselves. What did the blood mean to the Jews in Egypt? Why was the blood meaningful to God? And how did it save the Jewish people?

Answer: The Egyptians venerated the lamb. They couldn’t associate with anyone who herded sheep for the purpose of eating them (Genesis 43:32, 46:34, Exodus 8:22). For the Jew to slaughter the lamb it was an act of faith. Not in the lamb; but of faith in…

View original post 313 more words

Posted in General | 4 Comments

Study Notes and References

Study Notes and References for
UNANSWERED
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbjxF5sKxxM
Questions that Dr. Michael Brown Has Failed to Address

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2016/04/19/study-notes/

The video lecture entitled; Unanswered, is but a brief sampling of the arguments that I have presented to refute Dr. Brown’s writings. Please refer to Contra Brown, The Elephant and the Suit, Supplement to Contra Brown, Kosher Reality and Response to Line of Fire for a comprehensive refutation of his works.

CONTRA BROWN: Answering Dr. Brown’s Objections to Judaism

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/contra-brown/__

_ _

THE ELEPHANT AND THE SUIT: A Critical Review of Dr. Michael L. Brown’s “Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus” – 5 Volumes

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/the-elephant-and-the-suit/__

_ _

SUPPLEMENT TO CONTRA BROWN: A Critical Review of “Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus”

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/supplement-to-contra-brown/

Response to Dr. Brown LINE OF FIRE Radio Broadcasts:

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/category/response-to-dr-brown-line-of-fire/__

KOSHER REALITY: A Jewish Response to “The Real Kosher Jesus” by Dr. Michael L Brown

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/kosher-reality/

The following articles were not necessarily written as a direct refutation to Dr. Brown’s writings but they will help you understand the three questions that I presented against the works of Dr. Brown.

Readers Guide to the Bible; Dr. Brown vs. God

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2015/05/10/the-totality-of-scripture/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2012/11/18/closing-arguments/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/forms-of-communication/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/1000-verses/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/is-teh-bible-an-algebra-textbook/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/the-context-of-scripture/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2012/01/01/use-and-abuse-of-the-scriptural-texts/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/faith-structure/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2012/06/05/is-the-jewish-bible-a-mystery-novel/

Idolatry, the Violation of a Relationship

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2010/11/10/knock-knock/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2011/12/11/another-mathematical-problem/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2012/05/16/incarnation-and-definition-of-marriage/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2012/05/13/idolatry-and-the-definition-of-marriage/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2011/05/26/isaiah-222/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2013/11/13/trinity-idolatry-and-worship/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2012/11/12/foundation-of-worship/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2012/11/13/foundation-of-worship-ii/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2012/11/14/foundation-of-worship-iii/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2011/05/17/tell-them-jeremiah-1011/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2014/01/28/heart-of-a-relationship/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2010/10/24/isaiah-44/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2014/03/27/this-is-my-beloved/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2014/09/17/test-of-love/

Messianic Prophecies; Dr. Brown vs. Dr. Brown

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/response-to-line-of-fire-11/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2010/10/03/the-ultimate-truth/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2014/09/14/messiah-letter-and-spirit/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2013/03/04/isaiah-53-vindication/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2013/01/24/the-kings-musician-tactics-of-persuasion/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2013/01/17/the-applicant-with-353-references/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2011/11/16/isaiah-53-micah-7-and-isaiah-62/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2011/05/24/hope-faithfulness-and-joy/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2011/01/30/yearning-for-the-messiah/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2010/12/21/letter-to-sy-about-messiah/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2010/09/05/the-polar-opposite/

https://yourphariseefriend.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/the-messianic-expectation/

These are in addition to the hundreds of articles that Judaism Resources has made available to expose the fallacies of the missionary arguments.

The following essays complement the video lecture entitled; “Unanswered.” We hope you find these study notes helpful. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at yourphariseefriend@gmail.com <mailto:yourphariseefriend@gmail.com>

Thank you:

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

The Fundamentals of Judaism

In the following paragraphs I will present the foundational Jewish beliefs concerning the key issues that stand between Judaism and Christianity (worship of God, atonement from sin, and the advent of the Messiah). I will also demonstrate how these beliefs are supported by the Biblical text.

Our devotion is directed to the God who spoke to us at Sinai and to Him alone. This core belief of Judaism is clearly stated in Exodus 20:1, 2. The passage records how God told the people: “I am the Lord your God who took you out of the land of Egypt from the house of bondage, you shall not recognize other gods before me”. This concept is repeated in Deuteronomy 4:35, where Moses reminds us: “You have been shown in order that you know that the Lord, He is the God there is none beside Him.”

Jews believe that God requires sincere repentance for the forgiveness of sin. This fundamental doctrine is plainly stated by the prophets. Isaiah taught: “Let the wicked one forsake his way and the iniquitous man his thoughts, let him return to the Lord and He will show him mercy, to our God for He is abundantly forgiving” (Isaiah 55:7). Ezekiel passes on the word of God: “As for the wicked one, if he repents from all his sins that he has committed, and he observes all My decrees and practices justice and righteousness, he shall surely live, he shall not die. All his transgressions that he has committed will not be remembered against him…” (Ezekiel 18:21, 22).

All of Judaism’s core beliefs about the Messiah and the Messianic age are clearly expressed in the Jewish Scriptures.

The prophets spoke of the ingathering of the Jewish exile (Deuteronomy 30:3, Isaiah 11:12, 40:11, 43:5,6, 49:12,18,22, 60:4, 66:20, Jeremiah 3:18, 30:3, 31:7, 32:37, Ezekiel 11:17, 20:41, 34:13, 36:24, 37:21).

Scripture describes the destruction of Israel’s enemies (Numbers 24:17,18; Deuteronomy 30:7; 32:43; 33:24; Isaiah 11:14; 14:25,26; 17:14; 18:6; 26:21; 34:8; 41:11,15; 49:25,26; 51:23; 60:12,14; 61:2; 63:4; Jeremiah 30:16,17; Ezekiel 39:10; Joel 4:2,21; Obadiah 1:18; Micah 5:8; 7:9; Daniel 2:44; Psalm 79:12; 83:18).

The Bible teaches about the vindication of Israel’s hope to God (Isaiah 26:2,13; 40:31; 49:23; 51:7; 54:17; 60:21; 62:2; Micah 7:8,9).

The prophets spoke of a Temple in Jerusalem (Isaiah 2:2, 60:7, Jeremiah 33:18, Ezekiel 37:26, 43:7, 44:15, Micah 4:1).

The Scripture tells us about a national return to Torah observance (Deuteronomy 30:8, Jeremiah 31:32, Ezekiel 11:20, 36:27, 37:24, 44:23,24).

The prophets taught us about universal peace (Isaiah 2:4, 65:25, Jeremiah 33:9,16, Ezekiel 34:25,28, 37:26, Hosea 2:20, Psalm 72:3).

And Israel looks forward to a world that is filled with the knowledge of God (Isaiah 11:9, 45:23, 54:13, 66:18,19,23, Jeremiah 3:17, 31:33, Ezekiel 38:23, Zephaniah 3:9, Zechariah 8:20-23, 14:9,16).

The fundamentals of Judaism are explicitly spelled out in the Scriptures.

Skip and Choose, Downplaying the Messianic Prophecies

Peace on Earth

Dr. Brown does not provide any evidence to minimize this aspect of the Messianic hope of the Jewish prophets. He just tells his audience that this was not the Messiah’s role during his “first coming.” The only argument he presents to support this fallacious position is that: “…nowhere in our Scriptures does it explicitly say “When the messiah comes there will be peace on earth.” Rather, it speaks of an era of peace at the end of the age (see Isaiah 2:1-4, without any mention of a Messianic figure there)” (Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus, Vol. 1, pg. 70)

In other words, because the prophets did not explicitly say the words that Dr. Brown would have them say, and because in one particular prophecy, they did not associate peace with a Messianic figure, he dismisses this central aspect of the Messianic vision and hope of the Jewish Scriptures.

Ezekiel 34:23-25; 37:24-26; Jeremiah 23:6 explicitly associate peace and security with a Messianic figure. The following passages speak of peace and security in the Messianic era without explicitly mentioning a Messianic figure. Isaiah 2:4; 11:6-9; 32:18; 52:7; 54:10,13; 60:17; 65:25; 66:12; Jeremiah 30:10; 32:37; 33:6,9; Ezekiel 28:26; Hosea 2:20; Zephaniah 3;13; Zechariah 14:11. This is aside from Haggai 2:9 and Zechariah 9:9 which Dr. Brown himself identifies as “significant” Messianic prophecies. These prophecies speak of an era of peace, but this detail of the prophecy is relegated by Dr. Brown to “fringe at best.”

The Restoration of the Jerusalem Temple 

Dr. Brown minimizes this aspect of the Messianic hope of our prophets by quoting Maimonides. Maimonides says that the Messiah will rebuild the Temple and Dr. Brown insists on understanding Maimonides’ statement in the most literal way possible; that the Messiah build the Temple with his own hands. Dr. Brown then goes on to complain that the prophets don’t say anything about the Messiah building the Temple.

Before we get to Dr. Brown’s treatment of Zechariah 6:13, let us see what Dr. Brown has to say about Israel’s hope for a restored Temple.

Dr. Brown claims that Isaiah spoke of the House of the Lord in Jerusalem (quoting 2:1-4), but Isaiah did not say anything about a restored or rebuilt Temple (Answering Jewish Objections, Vol. 3, pg. 171).

Dr. Brown does not explain how the “house of the Lord” is different from a “Temple” and he doesn’t tell his audience why he forgot to mention Isaiah 56:7; 60:7,13 which clearly speak of a Temple in the Messianic era.

Dr. Brown acknowledges that Jeremiah 33:10-11 speaks of thanksgiving offering being brought to the house of the Lord but he claims that “no mention is made of the Temple’s restoration.” Again, we have an explicit reference to God’s House in the Messianic era, yet it is not good enough for Dr. Brown.

Dr. Brown goes on to say that aside from the books of Zechariah and Ezekiel there is no mention of the Temple’s restoration nor is the rebuilding of the Temple associated with the mission of the Messiah. This statement is patently false. Joel 4:18 and Micah 4:1 both speak of a Temple in the Messianic era.

The book of Ezekiel devotes several chapters to the Temple in the Messianic age but Dr. Brown dismisses these prophecies because they do not explicitly state that the Messiah will be the one to build the Temple with his two hands. It is important to note that Ezekiel 37:28 points to the Temple as a purpose and goal of the Messianic hope. The prophet highlights the Temple and calls attention to it, but Dr. Brown would have us focus elsewhere.

When Dr. Brown discusses the book of Zechariah, he seems to have forgotten that Zechariah 14:20,21 mention the Temple in the Messianic age. Instead he turns his focus on Zechariah 6:12,13 which explicitly says “he will rebuild the Temple.” Dr. Brown does not tell his audience that in his interview with Lee Stroebel he enthusiastically declares that this prophecy is “the most overt passage in the Bible where a human being is explicitly identified with a Messianic figure” (The Case for the Real Jesus, pg. 199). Instead he complains that this prophecy appears in only one book of the Bible, he tells his audience that Rashi, the Jewish Bible commentator does not see this passage in Zechariah as a Messianic prophecy and he suggests that the Temple described in this passage might not be a literal Temple (Answering Jewish Objections, vol. 3, pgs. 170-179).

The Restoration of the Sacrificial System

In his attempt to minimize the restoration of the sacrificial system predicted by the Jewish prophets Dr. Brown dismisses the lengthy prophecies in Ezekiel (chapters 40 thru 48), which speak extensively about a restored sacrificial system, with the argument that the rabbis had difficulties explaining these passages.

Dr. Brown goes on to say that aside from Ezekiel only four other prophets make mention of the future sacrifices; Isaiah, Zechariah, Malachi and Jeremiah. Dr. Brown argues that Jeremiah is the only one of these four prophets who mentions Jewish people bringing the sacrifices (Jeremiah 33:10-11) and he claims that the references to future sacrifices in Isaiah, Zechariah and Malachi take up a total of three verses. He concludes with the assessment; “These are hardly major subjects in these prophetic books” (Answering Jewish Objections, Vol. 2, pg. 182).

Dr. Brown has conveniently forgotten that Ezekiel 20:41 (this is not one of those chapters that are difficult to interpret) explicitly speaks of Jewish people bringing sacrifices in the Messianic era. Dr. Brown has misunderstood the prophecies of Isaiah and Malachi. He points to Isaiah 19:21 and Malachi 1:11 as if they were Messianic predictions when in fact Isaiah is speaking of an event that was fulfilled during the times of the Second Temple and Malachi was speaking about his own times and not making a prophetic prediction.

But more important is the fact that Dr. Brown has conveniently forgotten that Isaiah speaks of sacrifices in the Messianic era in two other passages (56:7; 60:7). He also forgot that Malachi explicitly speaks of Jewish offerings and he describes them as a hope and purpose of the Messianic restoration (Malachi 3:3,4), and he also forgot Jeremiah 33:18.

Dr. Brown’s List of Messianic Prophecies Evaluated by Dr. Brown’s Own Standard

Let us examine the prophecies that Dr. Brown claims were fulfilled by Jesus (Answering Jewish Objections, Vol. 3, pgs. 153-154).

Dr. Brown tells us: “He was born where the prophet said he would be born (cf. Targum Jonathan, Rashi, Radak on Micha 5:2[1]).”

The prophet says nothing about the Messiah’s birthplace (neither does the Targum, Rashi, or the Radak). The prophet spoke of the clan from which the Messiah will come. The prophet is talking about a family, not a geographical location.

In any case, this is one prophecy, it takes the space of one verse and it appears in only one book. According to Dr. Brown, “hardly a major subject.”

Dr. Brown tells us: “He came into the world when the prophets said he would (according to the combined prophetic witness of Daniel, Haggai, and Malachi, along with hints found in the Talmud…).”

I have dealt extensively with this argument in Contra-Brown. To summarize we can say that none of these prophecies are quoted by the authors of Christian scripture as support for Jesus’ claims. According to Dr. Brown (page 18) a prophecy that is quoted only once by the Christian scriptures cannot be considered a “central” prophecy. This should certainly hold true with prophecies that are never quoted at all. There are serious problems with the Christian interpretations of these passages. These problems include (but are not limited to); the cutting off of the anointed mentioned by Daniel is to occur at the same time as the destruction of Jerusalem, The glory that Haggai speaks of is attributed to the Temple, not to a replacement of the Temple, and the visitation that Malachi speaks of is one that brings back the Levitical priesthood, not one which deposes it.

In any case, according to Dr. Brown’s standard, a prophecy which appears in only three of the prophetic books must be insignificant. Furthermore, Haggai’s prophecy does not mention a Messianic figure. According to Dr. Brown’s own standard, this factor relegates all of the prophecies from this category to the level of “fringe.”

Dr. Brown: “He performed miraculous deeds of deliverance and healing, in accordance with the prophecies of Isaiah (Isa. 35:5-7; 49:6-7; 61:1-3).”

Isaiah 35:5-7 explicitly tells us that these miracles will occur at the time of Israel’s physical restoration to the land. Isaiah 49:6-7 does not speak of miraculous healings. It speaks of God’s deliverance, which again, is associated with Israel’s physical restoration to their land. And Isaiah 61:1-3 also speaks of Israel’s physical restoration. In fact specific mention is made of comforting the mourners of Zion. These are the people who yearn for Israel’s restoration and honor, not those who look forward to Israel’s embarrassment.

Furthermore, the overall context of the book of Isaiah tells us that the “opening of the eyes of the blind” is a reference to Israel breaking free from the darkness of exile and not to the healing of a few blind people (see Isaiah 33:23, 41:17, 42:16, 43:8,20, 49:9-13, 52:11-12, Jeremiah 31:7).

In any case, one of these prophecies (35:7) does not mention a Messianic figure, which should relegate the category to “fringe” according to Dr. Brown. Furthermore, this concept appears in only one book of Scripture and in only three lonely prophecies, far too few for Dr. Brown’s standards that he set for the prophecies which he would have us dismiss.

Dr. Brown: “He was rejected by his own people, as was prophesied (Ps. 118:22; Isa. 49:4; 53:2-4).”

Psalm 118 does not speak of the Messiah. Isaiah 49 describes the subject as a servant to rulers, not a very fitting description of Jesus. And Isaiah 53, speaks of a rejection by the kings of nations, not by the subject’s own people.

Here too, only three prophets spoke of this concept, which is too few for Dr. Brown when it comes to the restoration of the sacrificial system.

Dr. Brown: “He suffered before his exaltation, as the prophets declared (Psalm 22; Isa. 52:13-15; Zech. 9:9).”

Psalm 22 does not explicitly speak of the Messiah. Isaiah 53 also does not explicitly speak of the Messiah, and the exaltation described by the prophet does not fit the career of Jesus. Zechariah speaks of a king who will put an end to war and govern in a literal sense, not a person who inspired more bloodshed than any other person in history.

Here too, only three prophets spoke of this concept, which is too few for Dr. Brown when it comes to the restoration of the sacrificial system.

Dr. Brown: “He died and then rose from the dead, according to the scriptures (Isaiah 53; Psalm 16; 22).”

Isaiah 53 is not talking of the Messiah. Psalm 16 and 22 don’t speak about a resurrection and they don’t mention the Messiah either. In any case, there is no reason to believe that Jesus rose from the dead. The only people that claim to have witnessed this event were people who were already totally devoted to him. It is clear that the standard of evidence that these people would have required before believing a resurrection would not be the same standard of evidence that an objective bystander would require.

Here too, only two prophets spoke of this concept, which is too few for Dr. Brown when it comes to the restoration of the sacrificial system.

Dr. Brown: “He has brought the light of God to the nations, as the prophets said he would (Isaiah 42, 49, 52) – so that countless millions of people who were once “pagans” now worship the God of Israel through him.”

Isaiah and the other scriptural prophets clearly and explicitly prophesied that the light will only come to the nations with the physical restoration of Israel (Isaiah 17:12 – 18:7, 25:1 – 8, 30:26, 34:1 – 35:10, 40:1 – 11, 41:17 – 20, 49:8 – 13, 52:7 – 10, Zephaniah 3:8 – 20, Psalm 9:8 – 13, 40, 66, 69, 98, 102, 117). The prophets were not looking forward to an age where a human being, a subject of nature, is deified by many nations. The prophets looked forward to a day when the only one exalted is the Supreme Master of Nature.

In any case, this prophecy appears in only one prophetic book and only in three prophecies. Not enough, according to Dr. Brown.

Dr. Brown: “His last act, before he returns to Jerusalem in power and glory, will be to turn his people Israel back to him (Isaiah 49) – and it is this that he is now doing!”

Isaiah 49 speaks nothing about a “last act” and the restoration that the prophet is talking of has nothing to do with an insidious missionary campaign that only succeeds amongst those who are ignorant of their heritage.

Thus the “main” messianic prophecies that Jesus allegedly fulfilled are either, non-existent, not messianic prophecies, not fulfilled by Jesus, or testify against the claims of Christianity. The Jewish objection rings loud and clear – Jesus fulfilled none of the Messianic prophecies.

The Purpose of the Messianic Age According to Scripture

What do the Scriptures teach us about the purpose of the Messianic age? Why do we want the Messianic age? And what are we looking forward to? What are the accomplishments of the Messianic age according to the prophets of Scripture and how will these accomplishments be achieved?

When God made a covenant with Abraham, He said that he would be a God for Abraham’s children (Genesis 17:7,8). When Moses was commissioned by God to redeem the Jewish people from Egypt, God told him that the purpose was so that He can be Israel’s God and they will be His people (Exodus 6:7). And when the prophets speak of the final redemption, they use the same terminology (Jeremiah 30:22; Ezekiel 37:27). This concept is repeated so many times and in such central settings that the Author of Scripture left us with no question that this concept is important to Him (Exodus 29:45; Leviticus 11:45; 22:33; 25:38; 26:12,45; Deuteronomy 26:17; 29:12; 2Samuel 7:24,26; Jeremiah 7:23; 11:7; 24:7; 30:25; 31:32; 32:38; Ezekiel 11:20; 14:11; 36:28; 37:23; Zechariah 8:8; 1Chronicles 17:22; see also Exodus 19:6; Deuteronomy 4:20; 7:6; 14:2; 26:18; 28:9; 1Samuel 12:22; 2Samuel 7:23; 2Kings 11:17; Isaiah 43:21; 51:16; 54:5; 62:5; Jeremiah 13:11; Hosea 2:18,21,22; 2Chronicles 23:16).

What does this mean? Isn’t God simply God? How is He going to be a God for Israel?

This is all about a relationship. The covenant relationship that Israel shares with God is compared to a marriage. A marriage is a relationship that redefines both participants to the outside world and God’s covenant relationship with Israel is no different.

Israel being God’s people means that they express loyalty to Him. That they give their hearts to no other in worship but to Him and that they follow His Law. That they hearken to His voice, love Him and cleave to Him.

And God reciprocates by showing His closeness to Israel in an open and manifest way. In a way that singles Israel out and sets them apart from the nations of the world. God does this by making His presence manifest in the Temple of the Jewish people. He does this by miraculously intervening to save the Jewish people from their enemies, planting them in the land that He promised to their ancestors and blessing them with peace (Exodus 19:6; Numbers 23:9; Deuteronomy 4:7; 33:29; 1Samuel 12:22; 2Samuel 7:23; 1 Kings 8:53; Isaiah 43:10; 59:21; Jeremiah 2:3; 31:10,35; Ezekiel 37:28; Joel 4:16; Amos 9:15; Zechariah 2:12; Malachi 3:12; Psalm 29:11; 111:9; 115:12).

Israel experienced this closeness to God in the times of Moses, in the times of Solomon and in the times of Hezekiah. But when Israel sinned and turned away from God, God turned away from them. He removed His protection from Israel, He removed His blessing of peace, He allowed them to be removed from their land and He removed His presence from the Temple.

The hope and yearning for the Messianic age is simply a hope and yearning for a reconciliation between God and Israel, His covenantal partner. The prophets cried for the restoration of Israel, the restoration of God’s presence to the midst of Israel and for Israel’s salvation from her enemies (Isaiah 64:8-10; Jeremiah 14:9; Zechariah 1:12; Psalm 28:9; 44:27; 51:20; 74:1,2; 79:5; 80:4-8; 83:1-19; 85:5-7; 102:14; 106:47; 126:4; 137:7; Lamentations 5:20,21).

But there is something else that they cried for as well. They cried for the shame of God and for the shame of Israel. When you see a Jew praying, you know exactly who he or she is praying to and you also know who they are not praying to. As long as the Jewish people are in exile and God’s closeness to them is not manifest, then the hope of the Jew seems to be an empty hope and the God of the Jew seems to be a powerless God. Those who do not appreciate the Jew’s relationship with God taunt the Jew and mock his God. They ask the Jew with derision; where is your God? And the prophets prayed that this shame be removed from God and from His nation (Joel 2:17; Psalm 42:4,11; 74:22; 79:9-13; 116:1,2; Daniel 9:16-19).

And the thrust and the purpose of the Messianic hope is that Israel’s hope is ultimately vindicated. The prophets promised that all the nations will see God manifest His closeness to Israel and they will realize that the One in whom Israel placed their trust is truly God and that all else is naught. (Isaiah 2:17,18; 24:21-23; 25:9; 26:1; 49:43; 52;10; 60:2,3; 61:11-62:4; Ezekiel 37:28; 38:23; Joel 2:27; Micah 7:10,16,17; Psalm 67:2-4; 69:35,36; 83:18,19; 97:6,7; 98:2,3; 99:2; 102:16-18; 126:2).

The prophets testified that Israel’s suffering will turn into joy when she hears that her God reigns (Isaiah 40:8; 52:7; Psalm 97:8).

Israel’s covenant with God and the Messianic hope cannot be separated from one another. The vindication of Israel’s relationship with God is the Messianic hope. They are one and the same.

The Messiah

The role of the king of any nation is to lead his nation to its national destiny and the king of Israel is no different.

Israel was created by God so that they can praise Him (Isaiah 43:21) and Israel yearns for her freedom just so that she can praise God (Psalm 79:13; 106:47; 115:18; 1Chronicles 16:35). This is Israel’s eternal destiny and Israel’s rightful king is David, who leads them in this task of praising God.

Israel’s hopes and yearnings are given expression on the harp of her king and Israel and David undergo the same experiences. They both recognize their poverty before God. They appreciate that man cannot possess security, strength, wisdom, or wealth because it all belongs to God. This sense of poverty is the heart of one who trusts in God, because if someone sees himself as possessing security or wealth, then their hearts lean on their imagined possessions. And when this sense of poverty and absolute trust in God is vindicated, then God is vindicated. This happens to the nation and it happens to the king. This is not a peripheral aspect of God’s plan for mankind, but it is the very heart of it. That when God vindicates those who trust in Him mankind learns to appreciate God and His absolute sovereignty (2Samuel 22:28; Isaiah 14:30,32; 25:4; 26:6; 41:17; 49:13; Psalm 9:10-12; 18:28; 31:8,9; 35:10; 40:18; 68:11; 69:30,34; 70:6; 74:19,21; 102:1,18; 109:31; 113:7; 140:13).

Praising God and recognizing one’s own poverty before God are also one and the same. You can only thank God for something that you believe He gave you and that you do not deserve. If you see yourself as a rightful possessor you will not find gratitude in your heart. You can only praise God from a position of recognizing your complete and absolute dependence upon God and His mercy. The nation of Israel and her king David exemplify this attitude of gratitude and recognition of complete dependence on God. The vindication of this attitude is the heart of the Messianic promise.

The first time the Messianic promise appears in Scripture is in Jacob’s blessing to his son, Judah (Genesis 49:10). The name “Judah” means praising and thanking God (Genesis 29:35). Thanking God is the center of the Messianic promise and it is the center of the destiny of the Jew, because after all, the name “Jew” is just an English version of the word “Judah;” praise God. And the king of the nation simply leads the nation to its national destiny, the destiny that is inherent in its very name.

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

Posted in Critique, Response to Dr. Brown Line of Fire | 1 Comment

An Open Invitation to Dr. Michael Brown

yourphariseefriend's avatar1000 Verses - a project of Judaism Resources

An Open Invitation to Dr. Michael Brown

It has come to my attention that Dr. Michael Brown has posted a public challenge to Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi to engage him in a public debate. In the context of this challenge Dr. Brown tells his audience that he has nothing to hide and that he is willing to the debate Rabbi Mizrachi in any venue.

The Jewish community has nothing to hide. Dr. Brown took the time and the effort to spell out his position in a comprehensive 5 volume series entitled “Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus.” In response, the Jewish community took the time and the effort to write and to publicize a comprehensive rebuttal to this series. As far as the Jewish community is concerned, all the cards are now on the table.

If you are seeking the real Jewish objections to Christianity, you shouldn’t expect to find them in…

View original post 555 more words

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Persuasion of the Heart – Deuteronomy 11:16

yourphariseefriend's avatar1000 Verses - a project of Judaism Resources

Persuasion of the Heart – Deuteronomy 11:16

“Beware for yourselves lest your heart be seduced and you turn astray and serve other gods and prostrate yourselves to them.”

Moses warns the people of Israel not to be led astray by their hearts. It would seem that the persuasion for idolatry appeals to the heart which would then lead a person to the worship of a strange god.

What is this persuasion of the heart, how does it work and how could we avoid it?

The word “seduction” or “persuasion” implies the influencing of someone to do something that they would have otherwise not done. The seducer affects the emotions of the one being seduced to the degree that they follow the seducer against their own set of values and even against their own best interest.

In the realm of worship the only relevant question is: To whom does my worship belong?…

View original post 556 more words

Posted in General | Leave a comment

The “Resurrection” – by Jim

Aaron,

You call it speculation for Fred to say that Jesus did not come back from the dead. To some degree this is true, but it is also speculation to say that Jesus did come back from the dead. After all, you did not see him. I did not see him. Fred did not see him. Apologists will say that the tomb is empty, but of course that does not imply a resurrection. For that you would need a living body. They want us to speculate; only they want us to speculate that Jesus came back from the dead. But this is not a reasonable conclusion.

I would like to conduct a thought experiment with you, if you are willing. It is one I have asked others to consider when they have insisted that we accept the resurrection. I would like you to take yourself back in time mentally. I would like you to put your self in the shoes of someone living during the time of Jesus. And I would like you to consider how the story of the resurrection would unfold to you if you were not a disciple of Jesus but merely an interested party.

Let us say that you have heard that Jesus claimed he was going to come back from the dead. Also, you have heard of his miracles. Perhaps you have even seen some. There is controversy surrounding Jesus, and perhaps you wonder if he might be the Messiah. Perhaps you are even hopeful that he might be the Messiah.

When he is put to death, at first you may be disappointed. Certainly you are saddened. But you remember his prediction. You do not rule him out of contention as Messiah, because he has three days in which to prove himself. Depending on how hopeful you are, you anticipate the third day with either curiosity or excitement.

Now, remember that you are not a disciple. So, when the third day comes around, you do not see him. You do not even hear of his resurrection, because it is not publicized. For you, the third day comes and goes with no fanfare. If you were anticipating his return you are disappointed.

After a week, he is still not back. He does not come back at three weeks. For you, life is returning to normal. You still must await the Messiah, just as you did before. It has been a month since Jesus died before you know it. Shavuot is fast approaching.

And that is when the announcement is made. Jesus disciples show up 50 days after his death, saying that he came back from the dead. By this you are surprised. It is long after the time we was supposed to come back. You may be interested, even excited. Perhaps you go to one of the disciples and say, “Take me to Jesus.” Or you want to, but then Peter tells everyone that Jesus did come back from the dead, but ten days ago, he rose into the heavens. He is not here now. But he was. Really. You just missed him.

I would like to take this opportunity to point out that this is the story of the gospels and the Book of Acts. I have only retold the story from a different perspective. According to the NT, Jesus did not appear to his critics. He did not appear publicly. He came to a few, here and there, in secret. Granted the NT contradicts itself on his appearances, but I am willing to put that aside for the moment. I only want to ask if it is a credible story.

Jesus did not come back on day three as promised, not so most people could know anyway. His supposed resurrection was not announced until day fifty. At that time, he is nowhere to be found. People say he came back, but they have no proof to offer. This story is not credible.

So, when you tell Fred that it is speculation that Jesus did not return from the grave, you should know, that you are only speculating that he did. The question is whether or not it is reasonable to believe that he did come back from the dead (and if so what that means.) And in fact, as this thought experiment shows, it is not reasonable to believe in the resurrection. It is an unsupported claim. At the time when Jesus’ resurrection was announced, the disciples produced no Jesus. They had to tell people instead that Jesus rose into the sky. The story is not compelling. Fred’s conclusion is not mere speculation but reasonable. Perhaps it is time to reconsider your own speculations.

Jim

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

Posted in General | 525 Comments

Emmanuel – by Jim

Aaron,

Once again, you display the importance of not ripping a part of Tanach out of the whole work. As I was working through reading this weekend’s messages, I could hardly believe that you considered the child of Isaiah 7, Emmanuel, to be Jesus or whatever you call him. Even a passing reading of Isaiah 7 will show that Isaiah cannot be talking about Jesus. Emmanuel was dead hundreds of years before Jesus was born. Do not lose heart, however. The author of the Gospel of Matthew has misled you; it is not your fault.

I urge you to return to Isaiah 7 without having Matthew 1 in mind. After all, this is how the book was read and understood for hundreds of years. And you should ask what the chapter is about. It will become obvious as you read the chapter that it is not about the Messiah. Normally, I do not think it best to identify what a chapter is not about, but in this case, because of the misrepresentations of the Church, it is useful and necessary. The chapter is about two armies that are threatening Judah, and the Jewish king that does not wish to rely upon God. Isaiah tells King Ahaz that the threat of the armies will be turned back, that God has not abandoned Judah. This is what is happening in Isaiah 7. Compare it with the Messianic chapter Isaiah 2, and you will note a world of difference.

You will note also that Isaiah tells Ahaz to ask for a sign. Ahaz refuses, so Isaiah offers him a sign anyway. This sign is an indication that God will save Judah from the two encroaching armies. And the sign is that a young woman will have a child and she will name the child Emmanuel. Also, before the child knows to choose between good and evil, so while he is still young, the two kings of whom Ahaz is afraid will no longer be a threat. This second part, the two verses concerning the child that follow Isaiah 7:14 are not quoted by the author of Matthew. The reason why is because he cannot. They would reveal the context of the prophecy and would show that they apply in no way to Jesus. But you and I, we must take careful note of the prophet’s words. And we must in no way allow ourselves to misrepresent them or tolerate those that do.

This child, Emmanuel, was born before these kings were no longer a threat to Israel. As you know, they did not live 600 years and only turn back at the birth of Jesus. Obviously not. No, they were turned back during the life of Emmanuel, a male child born in the time of Isaiah and Ahaz. And before he reached maturity, the kings were turned back.

Sometimes Christians are misled by the name ‘Emmanuel’. They are confused as to the nature of the name. They believe that it indicates that the child would be divine. “God with us” they think to mean that God came down to be with people. The name means nothing of the sort. The name is an indication that “God is with us” in the sense that He had not abandoned the Jewish people. He is on their side, not physically dwelling with them. This latter explanation is the one that fits within the context of the chapter; the former does not. Moreover, it is not unusual for Jewish names to have a divine name as part of them, as Isaiah’s name does. This does not mean that Isaiah was God. Furthermore, Isaiah is not the only prophet to name children as messages to the Jewish people. I am sure you will remember that Hosea, his contemporary in the north, did likewise.

You should also know that Matthew changed the words of Isaiah. Matthew does not like the prophets, apparently, for he constantly misrepresents their words. Not only does Isaiah not write of a virgin birth, as I am sure you are aware, but he writes that the woman would name her child Emmanuel. Matthew changes this to “they shall call his name Emmanuel”. Matthew wants ‘Emmanuel’ to sound like an honorific, but it is not. Isaiah is telling us that the woman would name the child Emmanuel, which Mary did not do. Mary named her child, ‘Jesus’. This by itself is a failure of Jesus to fulfill the prophecy.

I hope after reviewing these facts, you realize your error. I am sure it was unintentional. The Church has long misrepresented the passage. The way it is written does not fit their theology. However, if we seek the truth, if we wish to know what God says, then we cannot afford to accept uncritically such misrepresentations. Instead we must turn from a Church that manipulates the Word of God to invent its own theology. We must turn from a Church that rewrites the word of God. We must turn from a Church that considers its own opinions superior to that of the Creator. It is no wonder that the Church disallowed for so long its parishioners the right to read Tanach for themselves. It allowed them to bury the truth. Reading Isaiah 7 shows that it has nothing to do with Messiah. ‘Emmanuel’ is not Jesus, but died long before Jesus. He was not born of a virgin. And his mother actually named his child, ‘Emmanuel’.

Jim

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

Posted in General, Scripture | 2 Comments

Shattering Myths

yourphariseefriend's avatar1000 Verses - a project of Judaism Resources

Shattering Myths

The foundational texts of Christianity take the time to tell their readers much about Jews and Judaism. The writings of the Church Fathers and the subsequent luminaries of the various Churches maintained this pattern of instructing their respective audiences on the subject of Judaism.

This Christian habit of discussing Judaism is not a positive one. The pages of history are stained with the ramifications of this ugly tradition. And the effects of this pattern are still very evident in the conversation between the Christian and the Jew. The Christian enters into a conversation with a Jew assuming a load of misconceptions that were taught as “gospel” truth. The Jew may talk but the Christian will not hear because he already “knows” what the Jew will say.

The purpose of this humble article is to dispel some of the more prominent myths that Christians believe about Jews and Judaism…

View original post 1,442 more words

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Usurper in Triplicate

yourphariseefriend's avatar1000 Verses - a project of Judaism Resources

Usurper in Triplicate

Who is the book about? Who are the main characters in this story? What is the central theme of the narrative?

These are the questions that we ask ourselves when we read any work of literature.  It is important for us to distinguish between the fundamental and the peripheral, between the center-stage and the back-drop.

There is no reason that we should treat the Jewish Bible with less consideration than we would treat any other written work.

So who is the Jewish Bible about? Who are the main characters of this story? What is the central theme of the Bible narrative?

The Jewish Bible is about God and the people of Israel. God and the nation of Israel are the central characters in the book. The central theme of the Jewish Bible is the ongoing relationship between God and the Jewish people.  God’s law stands at the…

View original post 234 more words

Posted in General | Leave a comment