Excerpt from a letter to a Missionary

Perhaps it is time you faced the fact that you were educated by an institution with a long tradition steeped in falsehood – this even according to your standards. A tradition which developed the system of seizing an isolated passage or two from scripture – usually a passage which does not directly address the issue at hand – and establishes an entire theology on the non-contextual interpretation – while ignoring pages and pages of scripture which directly deal with the issue at hand. (For example the tradition of replacement theology or the Calvinist theology by which repentance plays no part in the atonement process.) I believe that you are capable of freeing yourself from this influence – but the first step is recognizing the influence and acknowledging its effects.

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

Posted in General | 10 Comments

Leviticus 17:11 and the Book of Hebrews

Leviticus 17:11 and the Book of Hebrews

 

The author of the book of Hebrews presents one of the lynchpins of the Christian missionary campaign in the 9th chapter of his work. In that chapter he states that there is no remission (from sin) without the shedding of blood (verse 22). It is on the basis of this statement that the masters of persuasion attempt to frighten their audience. The missionaries contend that since sins cannot be remitted without the shedding of blood then without Jesus’ sacrifice you are dead in your sins.

 

This lynchpin of the missionary campaign has no basis in reality. You see; the author of Hebrews did not present this statement as a revelation that he received in some secretive encounter. The author of the book of Hebrews presents his statement as a factual conclusion that he arrived at upon studying the Law of Moses.

 

The Law of Moses is in front of us and we can see that there is no basis for the conclusion that the author of Hebrews arrived at. Moses never says that there can be no remission from sin without the shedding of blood. The path for remission of the national sin that Moses maps out for us is repentance and not the shedding of blood (Deuteronomy 30:2). The prophet Jonah; who presumably also studied the Law of Moses, fully expected the sin of the Ninevites to be remitted on the basis of their repentance and without the shedding of any blood (Jonah 4:2). There are simply no grounds in the Law of Moses for the drastic statement found in Hebrews 9:22.

 

The missionaries are not daunted by this obvious inconsistency evident at the root of their work of persuasion. These missionaries have developed several imaginative explanations in an effort to justify the teaching presented by the author of the book of Hebrews.

 

Many missionaries defend this non-Scriptural teaching by quoting Leviticus 17:11. In that verse God explains why He prohibited the consumption of blood. It is because: “For the soul of the flesh is in the blood and I have assigned it for you upon the altar to atone for your souls for it is the blood that atones for the soul.” The closing phrase of this verse would seem to indicate that blood has a power to atone that is not found elsewhere. The missionaries seize up on this phrase and present it as if it had said that outside of the shedding of blood there is no atonement.

 

The fact is that this passage says nothing of the sort. This passage is not contrasting blood over and against other methods of achieving God’s forgiveness such as repentance. This passage is explaining why it is that God allowed us to eat other parts of the animal but prohibited the blood. This passage is contrasting the blood over and against other parts of the animal and is explaining why out of all the components of the animal it is the blood that atones. This passage is not negating the power of repentance to atone for sin.

 

Other missionaries focus on the Hebrew verb “kaper” (generally translated as “atone”) and contend that this verb is only found in the Jewish Bible in conjunction with a blood sacrifice. The argument assumes that this particular word (“kaper”) represents a complete and absolute cleansing from sin and that this level of cleansing from sin is not represented or described by any other word in the Jewish Bible. According to these missionaries the intent of the author of Hebrews was that this particular aspect of atonement can only be achieved through the shedding of blood.

 

There are four problems with this fanciful interpretation. First; it is clear that the author of the book of Hebrews was not limiting his statement to this particular aspect of atonement. The Greek word that he uses to describe remission from sin is not a word that is parallel to the Hebrew “kaper” which is translated as “atone”. The Greek word used by the author of Hebrews is more generally translated as “forgiveness” or remission in the sense of rescinding the punishment.

 

Second; there is no reason to believe that the Hebrew word “kaper” denotes the ultimate form of cleansing from sin. There are other words that the Jewish Bible uses to describe the process of remission from sin such as: “s’lach” (forgive), “no’se” (pardon) and “ratzon” (favor, appeasement). Arguably the most extreme expression used by the Jewish Bible is found in the Book of Ezekiel where God promises that all of the sinner’s transgressions will not be remembered against him (Ezekiel 18:22; 33:16). There is no reason to assume that these expressions describe a lesser remission from sin than does the verb “kaper”.

 

Third; the missionary argument is simply predicated on a lie. The word “kaper” is found in the Hebrew Bible in conjunction with various actions that atone such as a verbal confession or the offering of incense and is not exclusively used for the shedding of blood as the missionaries would have us believe (Exodus 30:15; 32:30; Leviticus 5:13; 16:6,10,11; Numbers 17:11; 31:50; Proverbs 16:6).

 

Finally; upon closer examination it will be revealed that the author of the book of Hebrews was not trying to exalt the blood sacrifices described in the Five Books of Moses. In fact this author is attempting to denigrate these offerings. The entire thrust of chapters 9 and 10 in the book of Hebrews is that since the offerings of the Temple needed to be repeated this somehow “proves” that they could never take away sin to begin with. There is no way to say that the author of Hebrews believed that the blood sacrifices of the Temple provided some sort of absolute and complete atonement.

 

There remains no way to defend the declaration of Hebrews 9:22.

 

But the inconsistency runs much deeper. According to the author of the book of Hebrews we are supposed to read Leviticus 17:11 and conclude that this is the most profound and critical teaching concerning atonement that is recorded in the entirety of the Jewish Bible. Then we are supposed to turn around and say that the blood offerings of the Temple never really atoned to begin with.

 

Go figure.

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

Posted in Atonement, Scripture | 75 Comments

Defeatist Propaganda

Defeatist Propaganda

 

One of the methods that can be used to overcome an opposing force is to sow seeds of despair and hopelessness in the hearts of those who would otherwise fight. If the invader can discourage and demoralize the defending army and convince them that their fight is doomed to fail then the invader will probably win.

 

The same defeatist propaganda can be used to encourage someone to enter into an adulterous relationship. If the seducer can convince the victim that their spouse is a demanding perfectionist and that they can never be perfect enough for him or her then the victim is that much more likely to fall into the trap of a destructive relationship.

 

The masters of persuasion have employed this tool of defeatist propaganda in their effort to discourage a direct relationship with God and to encourage a destructive relationship with Jesus. Paul argues that the Law that God set down before us is an impossible law and that if one has violated one commandment then they are guilty of having violated every one of the commandments (Galatians 3:10).

 

In his effort to convince people of the hopelessness of observing the Law Paul quotes Deuteronomy 27:26. This passage expresses a curse against anyone who does not uphold the words of the Law to do them. Paul contends that this curse applies to anyone who violates any particular commandment. Since we know that man is fallible and imperfect it is obvious that every person will at some point in their life violate at least some of the commandments. This brings us to Paul’s conclusion that everyone is cursed and that attempting to observe the Law is a hopeless fight.

 

How do we respond to the defeatist propaganda espoused by Paul and the masters of persuasion?

 

In the same Book of Deuteronomy God Himself refutes Paul’s message of defeat. God assures us through Moses that the commandment He has given us is not too difficult but rather it is close to us in our hearts and in our mouths to do it (Deuteronomy 30:14). Paul recognizes that this passage in Deuteronomy undermines his campaign to discourage a relationship with God. In Romans 10:5-10 Paul presents an interpretation of this passage that can only be described as criminal. Paul uses this very passage that encourages observance of the Law as presented by Moses to discourage observance of the Law to entice people to enter into a relationship of faith with Jesus.

 

David and Jeremiah also speak of the centrality of obedience to God’s in our lives David says that God did not demand burnt offerings or sin offerings but rather He opened our ears (Psalm 40:7). The message is that it is obedience and submission to God that God wants and not a blood offering that is devoid of obedience. This same message is echoed by Jeremiah (7:22,23) and by Samuel (1Samuel 15:22). Paul presents the passage in the Psalms by inserting the word “body” in place of the word “ears” (Hebrews 10:5). Paul uses this very passage to discourage a direct relationship with God and as part of his insidious campaign to seduce people to enter into a relationship with Jesus.

 

The fact is that God gave us the Law as a gift of life (Deuteronomy 30:15). God knows that we are imperfect and that we fail (Psalm 103:14). God repeatedly encourages us that when we fail; which will inevitably happen, then the path we need to take is to return to Him and rely on His mercy. This is true both on the level of national transgression (Deuteronomy 30:2) and on the level of individual transgression (Isaiah 55:7). The curse for violating the law applies to those who rebel against God and refuse to accept His sovereignty over them and in no way does it apply to those who look towards God with sincerity and humility and with trust in His mercy (Psalm 37:11).

 

God is good and forgiving and abundant in kindness to ALL who call to Him (Psalm 86:5). We can be confident in the shelter of God’s wings. It is not in our own deeds that we have any confidence but it is on the abundance of God’s mercy (Daniel 9:18). And with God at our side we have nothing to fear (Isaiah 43:2). All of the propaganda of our enemies is like chaff carried away by the wind (Isaiah 41:16) and our refusal to enter into a relationship that violates our covenant with God will ultimately be vindicated (Isaiah 26:2; 49:23).

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

 

Posted in Atonement | 169 Comments

The Temple Sacrifices

The Temple Sacrifices

 

The prophets repeatedly assured us that God forgives our sins when we repent (Isaiah 55:7; Ezekiel 18:23; 33:11). The prophets did not tell us that there is no forgiveness from sin without a blood offering. In fact in the book of Deuteronomy we read how God will accept Israel’s repentance even when they are in exile and without the ability to present a blood offering to God (Deuteronomy 30:2). The book of Jonah describes how God accepted the repentance of the Ninevites and how He rescinded His decree of destruction that their sins had brought upon them and no mention is made of a blood sacrifice (Jonah 3:10).

 

The question then arises; if all that is necessary to obtain God’s forgiveness is repentance then what purpose is served by the blood offerings of Leviticus? Why was it necessary for Israel to go through the elaborate rituals of the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 16:1-34) if repentance alone can bring about the same results?

 

This same question can be asked concerning the fast of Yom Kippur as observed in our day and age. Why is it necessary for Israel to fast and refrain from work on this day (Leviticus 23:26-32) if all that is necessary for atonement is repentance?

 

In order to find the answer to this question we need to go to the heart of the Temple sacrifices. No; it is not the blood that is the heart of the sacrificial system, it is the commandment of God (Jeremiah 7:22,23). Just as bread is not what sustains a person’s physical body but rather it is the word of God that gives us life (Deuteronomy 8:3) so it is with our spiritual life. It is not the blood or the incense that provides forgiveness but it is the power of God’s command. The heart of the Temple sacrifices is the obedience and submission to God’s command that is inherent in the sincere fulfillment of those rituals.

 

God’s commandments sanctify us (Numbers 15:40). When we obey God’s directives He infuses our lives with sanctity and holiness. Each of the commandments is a gift that allows us to come closer to Him and to be suffused with His holiness. The commandments are God’s way of extending His hand towards us to draw us closer to Him.

 

God provided the commandments relating to the Day of Atonement so that our repentance can be infused with the power and the sanctity of His commandment. God granted us this way of giving concrete expression to the contrition of our hearts as a gift to His people. By following the path that God mapped out for us we take hold of God’s hand extended towards us and our repentance is empowered and sanctified by God. This is God’s way of smoothing out the path for His people.

 

The same concept applies to the Temple sacrifices. The opportunity to offer the atoning sacrifices is a gift that God granted to us that draws us towards Him as we repent. These concrete expressions of repentance ordained by God empowered and sanctified our constant return to God. On the basis of the infusion of sanctity that we were granted through these commandments God’s presence was manifest in the midst of our nation.

 

Now that we are in exile; some of these gifts have been temporarily withdrawn from us. We still have the fasting and the refraining from work on Yom Kippur but we do not have the offerings of that holy day. This does not mean that we have no forgiveness from our sins. What it does mean is that the added sanctity that God provided through obedience to these particular commandments is no longer being extended to us. This lack of sanctity is expressed in the fact that we have no Temple and God’s presence is not manifest in our midst in an open and obvious way.

 

But God did not leave us in the dark. God told us exactly what we need to do to merit that His presence return to dwell in the Jerusalem Temple. We need to return to the teachings of Moses and obey them together as a national unit in sincere submission to God’s command. And God assured us that the suffering of our exile will one day bring us to this national repentance (Deuteronomy 30:2). When that happens God will bring us back to His land and rebuild our Temple (Ezekiel 37:28). We will then offer the sacrifices that God has commanded us to bring to His altar in purity and in righteousness (Ezekiel 20:40; Malachi 3:3,4).

 

To come back to our original question we will reiterate that God never spurns a heart that is broken in contrition before Him (Psalm 51:19). God is slow to anger, abundant in kindness and He forgives those who return to Him in sincerity and truth (Psalm 86:4; 103:8-10; Jonah 4:2). God’s forgiveness is available to everybody all the time. God made this foundational truth abundantly clear through the teachings of His prophets. What we are lacking today without the Temple sacrifices is the added sanctity that allowed God’s presence to be manifest in our midst (Leviticus 16:2).

 

We yearn for that closeness to God that we experienced when His presence was manifest in the Jerusalem Temple and we constantly pray for its restoration. But we know that there are no shortcuts. The only path to God is obedience to His commandment and hearkening to His voice (Jeremiah 7:22,23). And He has already told us what is good for us. It is to do justice, love kindness and walk humbly with God – and nothing else (Micah 6:8). God promised that He will eventually hear our voice and take up our cause (Micah 7:7).

 

May it happen speedily in our day.

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

Posted in Atonement | 16 Comments

The Prophet’s Perspective

The Prophet’s Perspective

 

Christian missionaries insist that you need blood for atonement. Not only do the missionaries claim that without blood there is no atonement for sin but they also contend that this doctrine is taught in the Jewish Scriptures.

 

These assertions are critical components in the ongoing missionary campaign to persuade people to give their hearts to Jesus. According to the missionary; when Jesus came on the scene, everyone already knew that their sins can never be forgiven without the shedding of blood because this is what the prophets of Scripture had proclaimed in the past. The missionary would have you believe that Jesus came to supply mankind with the blood atonement that they so desperately needed.

 

The problem that the missionary faces is the simple fact that the Jewish Scriptures do NOT say that you NEED blood for atonement. Yes; the prophets taught that blood offerings CAN atone (Leviticus 17:11), but that is not the same thing like saying that without blood there is no atonement. Isn’t that amazing? According to the missionary one of the most important principles that Scripture ought to teach us is that there is no atonement without blood yet there is not one verse in the entire Hebrew Bible that says anything of the sort.

 

How do the missionaries deal with this challenge to their house of cards?

 

In order to paint their doctrine into the Jewish Bible the missionaries turn to the book of Leviticus. They point to the many offerings listed in that book and they argue that these offerings were critical and central to the process of atonement. They point to other blood offerings mentioned in the Five Books of Moses in their effort to establish a theory of the “centrality of the sacrifices”. The missionary argument highlights these offerings and contends that the central position that these offerings occupy in the Five Books of Moses should lead one to the conclusion that there is no atonement without blood.

 

The Jewish response to this argument is that the critical and central component of the atonement process is repentance. While the Temple was standing God commanded us in some instances to express our repentance with a blood offering but the key factor in obtaining God’s forgiveness was always repentance.

 

The Christian missionaries claim that the Jewish response is not based on Scripture but rather it is built on the Jewish blind refusal to consider the claim of Jesus.

 

Fortunately we have a passage in the Jewish Bible that could tell us who exactly is reading the Bible with a distorting lens of bias.

 

In the book of Jonah the prophet witnesses God’s mercy when God forgives the Ninevites on the occasion of their repentance. Jonah then exclaims to God “I knew that You are a gracious and merciful God, slow to anger, abundant in kindness, and relent from doing harm.” The fact that God forgave the people of Nineveh after they repented did not surprise Jonah in the least. In fact this is exactly what Jonah expected.

 

Why? Did Jonah not study the Five Books and learn the doctrine of the “centrality of the sacrifices”? How could Jonah expect the Ninevites to find atonement without a blood offering?

 

Jonah supplies us with the answer to this question. Jonah quotes the Five Books of Moses. In so doing Jonah teaches us which passage in the Five Books is the one that identifies the critical factor in the atonement process. It is NOT Leviticus 17:11. In fact it is not any passage that mentions blood. Instead Jonah quotes Exodus 34:6 which describes God as a “God compassionate and gracious, slow to anger and abundant in kindness”. This is the passage from the Five Books that Jonah the prophet saw as central to the process of achieving forgiveness from sin.

 

It is clear that Jonah the prophet read the Jewish Bible the way Jews read it today and the missionary teaching that claims to be based on the Five Books of Moses was as foreign to Jonah as it is to Jews today.

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

Posted in Atonement | 95 Comments

Eternal Freedom

Eternal Freedom

 

Passover is the time when we sit around the table with our families to thank God for redeeming us from slavery and making us free. We give praise for the gift that He bestowed upon us by making us His bride; a nation unto God.

 

In a certain sense it was easy for that first generation of Jews in Egypt. They looked back at the dark days of slavery under Pharaoh and they looked forward to days flooded with light as servants of God. But for us; who have the perspective of history, it is perhaps more difficult. Looking back at our blood-soaked past what kind of freedom do we see? Is it freedom to be locked into ghettoes? Being the chosen nation cost us dearly. We were consistently denied our civil liberties, robbed of our possessions and often enough it cost us our lives. What are we thanking for?

 

In order to answer this question we need a different perspective on freedom, a different perspective on our status as a chosen nation and a different perspective on life. And it is by absorbing the lesson of the Passover lamb that we can acquire this new perspective.

 

The offering of an animal as a sacrifice to God embodies a deep and powerful lesson. The body of the animal is utterly destroyed. It is consumed by the worshipers who eat its meat and by the fires of the altar. What remains from the lamb is the relationship with God that is renewed through the offering.

 

The lesson is this. Anything and everything that we share with the animal is ephemeral and transient. We are more than happy to give up the animal side of ourselves for the sake of coming closer to God. We are not interested in a freedom that an animal can appreciate. The freedom that we yearn for and the freedom that we were eternally granted by God is the freedom to be people, the freedom to live the ideals of justice charity and holiness and these can never be taken away from us.

 

The tragedy that the Jewish people suffered in the holocaust was unimaginable. But the freedom that they were granted when God took them out of Egypt spared them from a far greater tragedy. As God’s chosen people we were spared the tragedy of becoming animals. The beastly spirit which brought people to murder little children did not overtake us. The darkness that induced people to be saturated with hatred did not blacken our souls. When those around us were enslaved to the animalistic side of nature we remained free to serve God with our humanity.

 

It is for this freedom that we thank.

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

 

 

Posted in Holidays | 28 Comments

The Passover Altar

The Passover Altar

 

There were ten miracles that occurred in the Temple on a regular basis. One of these miracles involved the smoke that arose from the fire of the altar. The altar was a large structure situated in the open courtyard of the Temple and there was a fire constantly burning on top of the altar (Leviticus 6:6). This fire consumed the offerings of Israel and sent them heavenward in a pillar of smoke. The miracle that was manifest in the smoke was that the wind never dispersed the smoke. The smoke always ascended heavenward in a solid pillar.

 

We can imagine that when the pilgrims journeyed from afar to worship at the Temple the first thing they would see from miles around Jerusalem was this pillar of smoke. Long before they could see the towering structure of the Temple itself they would see this pillar of smoke.

 

In a certain sense this pillar of smoke symbolized everything that the Temple stood for. The Temple stood for Israel’s submission towards God, Israel’s love for God and Israel’s recognition of God’s absolute sovereignty over every facet of existence and all of these found expression in the fire on the altar. The fire represented the yearning in Israel’s heart to connect to God. When Israel saw the fire consuming the offerings they saw how every facet of life ought to be directed towards God and it was at the altar where the Jewish people would dedicate and rededicate their every breath to the God of their fathers.

 

With all of this in mind we run into a problem when we study that first Passover offering. When the Jewish people slaughtered the lamb on that fateful evening in Egypt there was no altar upon which they could place the blood or the fats of their offering. How can there be an offering without an altar? If the altar and her fire represent the dedication of life in service of God then why was it absent in that first national offering? How could the central message of the sacrificial system be conveyed without an altar?

 

The passage that describes that first Passover offering can perhaps shed some light on this question. When God commands Moses concerning the Passover He emphasizes the concept of a “house” or a “home”. The offering is to be taken for each “house” of fathers. The blood of the offering is to be placed on the doorposts of the “house”. Yeast and leaven cannot be found in the “house”. The meat of the offering must be eaten in one “house” and it cannot be removed from the “house. And when the Israelites are to explain the miracle of Passover to their children they are to say that God passed over our “houses” while He smote the Egyptians and He saved our “houses” (Exodus 12:3,7,15,19,27,46).

 

The houses that were saved were the houses that God loved (Numbers 24:5). He loved them because of the charity and justice that was planted in those houses by Israel’s forefather Abraham (Genesis 18:19). And justice and charity are more beloved by God than the offerings (Proverbs 21:3).

 

The fire and the smoke of the altar only represented the yearning to connect to God and Israel’s submission towards God. Justice and charity are in and of themselves a connection to God and submission to God (Jeremiah 22:16).

 

Just as the blood of offerings sanctified the altar (Leviticus 8:15) so it was with the houses of Israel. These houses were sanctified with the blood of the Passover so that Israel can be a nation unto God (Exodus 6:7).

 

The Passover offering was not done without an altar. The altar was the home of the Jew. The altar of the Temple is actually meaningless without the altar of the home. It is only to the degree that we have incorporated the concepts of charity and justice into every step of our daily life that the fire on the altar represent a true yearning for God (Isaiah 1:10-17). But if we don’t know God in our daily lives then what does the smoke on the altar mean?

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

Posted in Holidays | 5 Comments

Nine Letters # 9 – Covenantal Context

As  a Jew – I stand in a covenantal relationship with the Creator of heaven and earth.  He calls Himself the “God of Israel” and he calls us “My nation”. The most  foundational element of my relationship with God demands that I do not submit  myself to anyone in the way that I submit myself to Him. When God sealed this  covenant with us, He made it very clear to us that such an act of  submission/worship towards any other entity aside from Himself would be the deepest  violation of our covenant with Him. He also made it clear to us – how we are to  identify Him in worship – and how we are not to identify Him in worship. He did  all this before He gave us the first page of Scripture.

Let  us stop right there for a minute – after Sinai, and before we read the first  page of Scripture.

How  would we look at a claim such as the one you present about Yeshua? There is no  question we would identify the worship/submission that you are encouraging as  the very act that God defined as the deepest violation of our covenantal  relationship. There would be no way that we could look at it any  differently.

Now  let us take the book. But before we open it – let us remember that it was given  to us in the context of the covenantal relationship that already tied us to God.  It was given to us AFTER God already made clear to us who and how He wants us to  worship. Let us now jump ahead to the “ancient of days” mentioned in Daniel 7.  Let us note that this passage is not being presented as a teaching on the nature  of God (as is Isaiah 40:18) and it is not being presented as a teaching on how  we are to direct our worship (as was the revelation at Sinai). This being the  case – we understand that the physical description of God is being used as a  metaphor to help us understand God’s interaction with mankind that is being  presented there. The Scriptures use such metaphors for entities other than God.  In Psalm 98:8 – the rivers are described as “clapping their hands”. Am I to  assume that the rivers have hands? As clearly as I know that the rivers don’t  have literal hands – I know just as clearly that the God that I am bound to in a  covenantal relationship has no form.

There is no way I can read Daniel 7 (or Genesis 18,  Exodus 24, Isaiah 9) as a directive to go and do what God Himself explicitly and  directly taught me not to do.

Let  me take this one step further. I am advocating that you read the Jewish Bible in  the covenantal context that God placed it. If you would read the book in its  proper context – you would never dream of justifying the worship you are  advocating. But even if we put the Sinai covenant aside (for argument’s sake) – you still would not see your worship in this book unless you approached it with  an affinity for Jesus.

Before Jesus came to the world – no one ever claimed that  the Jewish Scriptures advocate worship of a divine Messiah. Even the apostles  who lived with Jesus and heard him teach for three years didn’t see this concept  in the Jewish Scriptures. They saw Jesus’ death as a contradiction to the belief  that he was the Jewish Messiah – not as a confirmation.

So  let’s recap – God made it clear who it is that we are to worship. Everyone who  read the Scriptures before Jesus came along – had no questions about this  matter. So are we to overturn the understanding that God made abundantly clear – on the basis of an interpretation that no-one saw in the text until 1) they had  already committed their hearts to Jesus, 2) the facts of Jesus’ suffering and  death left them with no choice but to reinterpret the Scriptures in a way that  they could still maintain their devotion.

Why  is it that of all the texts that you use to justify the worship that you are  advocating – not one of them has God put His finger on it and say – here – look  here in order to learn how to direct your devotion – not one! Yet when we focus  on those texts where the Divine Author clearly pointed and said – here is where  I present a teaching on worship – the perception that we were taught at Sinai is  only confirmed and reconfirmed?

One  more question. Again – the perception we were taught at Sinai would have us  identify the worship you are advocating as idolatry. You are arguing that we  modify our perception of reality that God taught us at Sinai – on the basis of  your interpretation of Scripture. Now there are certain passages in Scripture  that are very clear and direct. They teach us to keep the Sabbath, to observe  the festivals, and to abstain from certain foods. I don’t see you (and I don’t  mean you personally – I am talking about the general attitude of followers of  Jesus towards God’s holy Law) taking any of these clear and open commandments  seriously. So how can I believe that it is your loyalty and submission to this  book that has you advocating the worship that you advocate? How do you expect me  to take your argument seriously? It should be obvious to you as it is obvious to  me that it is your devotion to Jesus that is producing your read on  Scripture and that it is not your read on Scripture that is producing  your devotion to Jesus.

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

Posted in Correspondence, The Ultimate Truth | 2 Comments

Nine Letters # 8 – Idolatry and the Rest of the Commandments

You  ask me if the God of Tanach is the same as Allah of Islam. I am not familiar  with Islamic theology so I cannot answer your question – but I get the gist of  what you are driving at. If I understood you correctly – you are asking me how I  could equate a god who demands that his followers blow themselves up in order to  kill innocents – with a God who holds every human life precious to  Him.

Again, I take the liberty of assuming that I understood  your question.

Your question blurs an important distinction – the  distinction between idolatry, which relates to the act of worship (and I refer  here to the act of self-negation and complete submission that is only  appropriate towards the Master of all existence) – and between every other part  of our lives before God.

I  will bring two Scriptural concepts forward to support my contention. First – When it comes to idolatry – God did not rely on the agency of Moses or on our  ability to interpret His word to teach us this commandment. He chose to teach it  to us as a national unit – directly – Himself – before He gave us the first book  of Scripture. The Torah highlights this truth in Deuteronomy 4:35 – by saying  that we were granted a complete knowledge of this matter – something that is not  paralleled with the other commandments. Second – the act of idolatry is  consistently portrayed as an act of adultery that violates our covenant with God – also not found with the other commandments.

It  is theoretically possible to come to a solid understanding of God’s will – to  have a deep understanding into the justice that God desires, and a  grasp of the kindness that God loves, and an awareness of the holiness that  God demands – and still be an idolater.

It  is also possible to get everything wrong – not understand the justice, kindness  and holiness that God wants and not be an idolater.

You  see – when God prohibited idolatry – He did not just say “don’t worship the sun  and the moon” – but He also said – don’t use anything to represent Me  (Deuteronomy 4:15). In other words – even when worshiping the God of Abraham  Isaac and Jacob – who abhors murder and immorality and who loves kindness and  justice – but we direct ourselves towards something from within finite existence – it  is idolatry. It doesn’t make a difference what we believe about this something – it is still idolatry.

On  the other hand – if we never heard of Abraham Isaac and Jacob – and our sense of  God’s will is inaccurate (which it is for every human being – though for some  more than for others) – but our worship is directed completely away from all  finite existence – towards the Master of all finite existence – then we have not  committed spiritual adultery and we are not idolaters.

Back to your question, I don’t know what Moslems worship – but if their worship is directed away from every finite existence towards the  infinite Master of all existence – then when Israel’s God is exalted – they will  not be shamed as idolaters.

In  response to your quote from Revelations – last time I checked – the lamb is  created by God – walked God’s earth and breathed His air. I am well aware that  we can call ‘finite” “infinite”, and call “created” “Creator”, and call a “man” “divine” – and attribute all of these to “mystery”.

This is not Jacob’s portion – Jeremiah 10:16, Isaiah  45:19

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

Posted in Correspondence, The Ultimate Truth | Leave a comment

Nine Letters # 7 – Sinlessness and the Statue

God’s sinlessness is inherent to His very nature – He  cannot sin because sin, by definition, means going against His will. If you  point to an inhabitant of this earth and say he was sinless (how anyone could  know that is beyond me) – then it is a happenstance. If a person happened to be  sinless – he is still completely and absolutely subject to the Creator of heaven  and earth. To point to his alleged sinlessness as a motive for worship is no  different than pointing to the alleged beauty of a statue as a motive for  worship – one is pointing to physical beauty and one is pointing to spiritual  beauty – but both of these beauties are part and parcel of God’s creation – they  are gifts from God – the possesors of these beauties are recipients of God’s  kindness. And the prohibition against idolatry doesn’t allow us to confuse  recipient with the Ultimate Giver.

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

Posted in Correspondence, The Ultimate Truth | 3 Comments